In the Woodford text there is some dispute over abstract reason. In this case he states "reason, as defined herein, is a tool of understanding that intellectuals employ in their ongoing conversation as to the nature of truth, beauty, freedom, and love" (Woodford 39-40). He then goes on to explain that in this context, postmodern and other contemporary critics still have not settled on one firm definition of abstract reason. Reason in this instance is the tool to understanding.
Woodford uses the term intellectuals, but what determines someone as intellectual? Who has the authority to label the qualifications of an intellectual individual. Is he using intellectual as a synonym for higher educated individuals? my problem is what indicates an intellectual or non-intellectual being and how can Woodford use these words so comfortably as if he has the authority to label individuals as such. I was bothered by his word choice and phrasing so I wanted to blog. Enjoy.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment